Drawing for TWILKY

USPTO serial 79195616

TWILKY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWILKY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole Gage

Nicole Gage Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street N.W., Suite 600Washington, DC 20007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Baked goods, namely, crumbles, bread, candy bars, cereal bars, cereal based energy bars, waffles; confectionery, namely, pastilles, confectionery chips for baking, confectionery made of sugar, confectionery made of sugar substitutes, confectionery made of chocolate; chocolate and bakery desserts; ice, ice creams, frozen yogurts and sorbets; processed grains, starches, namely, food starch, starch for use in manufacturing food, starch-based binding agents for ice cream, starch-based thickeners for whipped cream, starch syrup for food; baking preparations, namely, mixes for making baking batters; yeasts; pastries, cakes, tarts and biscuits in the nature of cookies; cereal bars and cereal based energy bars; sweets, namely, candy, candy bars and chewing gumSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 8, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 1, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 10, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance