CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EVOGLOSS

USPTO serial 79195942

EVOGLOSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5283181Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 12, 2017
Examiner
BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with EVOGLOSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sydney R. Jensen

Sydney R. Jensen Carr & Ferrell LLP411 Borel Avenue, Suite 603San Mateo, CA 94402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials made of wood and synthetic materials for building, construction, and road construction purposes, namely, panels, fiberboards, medium density fiberboards (MDFs), printed fiberboards, particleboards, high gloss wood boards, high gloss wood panels, and wood boards; non-metallic building materials, namely, panels, fiberboards, medium density fiberboards (MDFs), printed fiberboards, particleboards, high gloss boards, high gloss panels, and wood boards; building materials, namely, natural and synthetic coatings for decorative purposes in the form of panels and sheets [ ; doors and windows of wood and synthetic materials ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 20, 2025INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 22, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 9, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 8, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 8, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 8, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 6, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 12, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 17, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance