Drawing for GENASYS

USPTO serial 79196052

GENASYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENASYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

Susan Upton Douglass Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 Times Square, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing insurance information and advice; providing insurance policy administrationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Providing computer software services in the nature of application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications in the field of insurance; providing temporary use of a web-based software application for insurance policy administrationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 19, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 31, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 31, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2016RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance