USPTO serial 79196087
Ü IMURAYA MOCHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Ü IMURAYA MOCHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk and milk products, namely, yogurt, cottage cheese, condensed milk, milk powder, cream, whipped cream, butter | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Ice cream | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruits and vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Whey beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 043 | Snack bar services, namely, providing ice cream and whey beverages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMURAYA GROUP CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by IMURAYA GROUP CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named Ü IMURAYA MOCHI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |