Drawing for CDR WINELAB

USPTO serial 79196227

CDR WINELAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5225491Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 20, 2017
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CDR WINELAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian A. Tollefson

Brian A. Tollefson Tollefson IP326 First Street, Suite 202Annapolis, MD 21403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Reagents for use in the analysis of foodstuffs, beverages, wines and beers; reagents used for testing water; reagents for use in scientific apparatus for chemical or biological analysis, not for medical or veterinary purposes [ ; reagents for microbiological analysis, not for medical or veterinary purposes; chemical reagents for identification of microorganisms, not for medical or veterinary use ]ACTIVE—
009Electric apparatus for the analysis of wine; computer software for collecting, transmission and processing of data for the analysis of wine; electric devices, namely, spectrophotometric analyzer and temperature sensors for use in the control of wine testing and quality control of wineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 28, 2024INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 19, 2024INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 26, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 20, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 29, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance