USPTO serial 79196254
A2LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5288273Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2017
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A2LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor A. Cardona
Victor A. Cardona Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C.5 Columbia CircleAlbany, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Soil screening machines; vibrating screens being parts of machines; jaw type rock crushers; impact grinding crushers; track mounted crushers; excavators; mini excavators; loader buckets for excavators; attachments for excavators, namely, grapple buckets, earth augers, backhoes, bale spikes, couplers, tilt buckets, digging buckets, wide buckets, spade buckets, multi grab buckets, rotating stone grabs, rippers, root rakes, pallet forks, and track guards; bucket excavators; trenchers in the nature of excavators; Non-electric couplers being parts of machines; hitches being parts of machines; parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |