USPTO serial 79196297
HOWA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOWA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
96456 Neustadt bei Coburg, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture; mirrors; picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, puppets and accessories therefore, toy models, clothing for dolls, doll rooms, doll beds, doll houses, toy fabrics and linens for dolls, strollers for dolls, role playing toys in the nature of play sets for children to imitate real life occupations, toy furniture, toy houses, molded toy figures, toy construction sets, children's educational toys for developing fine motor skills, cognitive skills and/or counting skills, children's multiple activity toys, modeled plastic toy figurines, toy mobiles, toy vehicles; gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, toy tents and play tents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |