USPTO serial 79196316
BLADE DESIGN SUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5361901Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 26, 2017
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLADE DESIGN SUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
Jeffrey H. Kaufman MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication machines and apparatus, namely, digital coherent transceivers, optical modulators, optical circuits and semi-conductor chips, optical amplifiers, optical couplers, optical switches, optical gratings, optical drivers, and reference printed circuit boards, laser chips, pump and signal combiners, pump lasers, interferometers, fiber laser mirror gratings, fiber Bragg gratings, cladding power strippers, frequency taps and splitters, photo detectors, optical isolators, optical attenuators, optical modulators, optical circulators, optical polarizers, optical filters, waveguides, wavelength division multiplexers, optical add and drop multiplexers; computer software for telecommunication machines and apparatus; software development tools in the field of telecommunication machines and apparatus; computer programs for telecommunication machines and apparatus; electronic communications and telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely, digital coherent transceivers; communications and telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely, digital coherent transceivers; Electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, digital coherent transceivers all for processing, logging, storing, transmission, retrieval or reception of data; development tools in the field of telecommunication machines and apparatus, namely reference boards and software development kits (SDK) | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Rental of computer software | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NTT Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by NTT Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by NTT Innovative Devices Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BLADE DESIGN SUITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 31, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |