USPTO serial 79196371
PANTYKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5348187Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2017
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANTYKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald S. Lombard
Ronald S. Lombard Law Office of Ronald S. Lombard4430 Twin Oaks DriveMurrysville, PA 15668UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical clothing, namely, surgical scrub suits, surgical gowns, surgical caps, operating room apparel, compression sleeves, compression tights; medical support clothing, in particular stockings, support brassieres, and orthopaedic support bandages; medical monitoring and testing apparatus for monitoring heart rate, testing blood, and apparatus for measuring and recording heart rate, heart rate variability, blood pressure, oxygen supply, body temperature skin conductivity, blood glucose and lactic acid levels | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, in particular underwear for men, women and children, socks, sports clothing in the nature of shirts, shorts, headbands, belts, sports jerseys and breeches for sports, sports over uniforms, sports shoes, sports vests, tank tops, crop tops, running tights, recovery pants, recovery tights; footwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of clothing; treatment of textiles and fabrics in the nature of chemical treatment of textiles, mold prevention treatment of textiles, crease-resistant treatment of clothing, textiles, and fabrics, stain resistant treatment of clothing, textiles, and fabrics, applying elastomer, modified elastomer for thermoregulation and thermoplastics to clothing, textiles and fabrics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NTT New Textiles Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by NTT New Textiles Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by NTT New Textiles Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named PANTYKING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |