Drawing for VOGA

USPTO serial 79196398

VOGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VOGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yue (Robert) Xu

YUE (ROBERT) XU US FAIRSKY LLP160 ALAMO PLAZA #942ALAMO, CA 94507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripheral devices; laptop computers; cell phones; walkie-talkies; batteries, electric; DVD players; cameras; electric control panelsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 24, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 24, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 24, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 22, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 22, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 23, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2018OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 9, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 4, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 31, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 1, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance