Drawing for IRONSTONE BLOCK

USPTO serial 79196497

IRONSTONE BLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IRONSTONE BLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheryl De Luca

Sheryl De Luca Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beer; alcoholic preparations for making beverages, other than beer-based; beverages containing wine, namely, where wine is predominating, namely, prepared wine cocktails, wine mixers, wine fruit juices, wine coolers, wine spritzers, wine-based beverages; blended wine; dessert wine; drinks containing wine, where wine is predominating, namely, prepared wine cocktails, wine mixers, wine fruit juices, wine coolers, wine spritzers, wine-based drinks; non-sparkling wines; red wine; sparkling wines; white wine; wine; spirits; liqueursSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2019IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Mar 26, 2019IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 20, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2018IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
May 4, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2017IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 18, 2017UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 26, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance