Drawing for BOOTY BUILDER THE ORIGINAL HIP THRUST MACHINE

USPTO serial 79196521

BOOTY BUILDER THE ORIGINAL HIP THRUST MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5510288Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 10, 2018
Examiner
SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BOOTY BUILDER THE ORIGINAL HIP THRUST MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael T. Smith

Michael T. Smith BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP2600 Park Tower Drive, Suite 600Vienna, VA 22180United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games and playthings, namely, board games, card games, beanbags, and playballs; gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, manually-operated exercise equipment and stretch bands used for physical fitness purposes; decorations for christmas treesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 23, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 30, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2024EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 11, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 19, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 19, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 18, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 18, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 24, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance