Drawing for NETMIND

USPTO serial 79196691

NETMIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5494395Status 708Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2018
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NETMIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason L DeFrancesco

Jason L DeFrancesco DeFrancescoLaw110 Dungannon Blvd, Ste 101Wilmington, NC 28403United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Management assistance services in the fields of information systems, namely, information technology (IT) [ ; employment agencies, namely, implementing psychological testing in the field of IQ, personality and attitudes; retail store services provided via global computer networks in the field of teaching materials and training courses, namely, for information technology (IT) ]ACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, training and mentoring in the design and development of information technology, IT services, project management, soft skills, and best practicesACTIVE—
042[ Database reconstruction services for others; ] computer software-related consultations in the field of IT services, solutions and projects [ ; computer system design; development, design, installation and maintenance of computer software in the field of IT services, solutions and projects; website design; industrial analysis in the nature of computer system analysis and scientific research services ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 7, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2025C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 30, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2025PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Dec 30, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2024INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 28, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2024LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2024ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 16, 2024COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 19, 2023LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 8, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 23, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2020CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 1, 2020CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 19, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 11, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 8, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance