Drawing for FINETTE

USPTO serial 79196976

FINETTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FINETTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie E. Sternberg

Jamie E. Sternberg Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Sanitary preparations for medical use; disinfectants; medical plasters, medicated compresses, bandages for dressings and other medical dressings; first-aid boxes, filled; sanitary towels, pads and knickers; tissues impregnated with disinfectants, for medical use; products for incontinent, namely, diapers, panty liners, absorbent pants, and absorbent padsACTIVE—
010Surgical apparatus and instruments; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; suture materials; syringes for injections; slings for medical use; urological instruments, apparatus and devices, namely, monitoring, testing and diagnostic apparatus, urine bags in the nature of medical specimen collection devices for use with catheters and colostomy, urinals, catheters and catheter sets, tubes and tubing sets, bed pans; tweezers for medical purposes and other surgical instruments; thermometers for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 27, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 12, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2017CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 23, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 23, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 13, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 13, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 29, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2017LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 15, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 17, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 15, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance