Drawing for KURIKI

USPTO serial 79196999

KURIKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KURIKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Door closer of metal, non-electric; door stops of metal; door handles of metal; door fittings of metal; runners of metal for sliding doors; locks of metal, other than electric; metal keys for locksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2024CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 6, 2024CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 16, 2024CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 13, 2024CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 18, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 8, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance