USPTO serial 79197024
RK DUOLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2017
- Examiner
- SCHWAB, CHAU CRISTIA H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RK DUOLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
DE
Other trademarks owned by RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
DE
Other trademarks owned by RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
DE
Other trademarks owned by RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. STRIKER
MICHAEL J. STRIKER COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Linear guides as parts of machines; adjusting mechanism in the nature of linear actuators being parts of machines for use in handling technology, packaging technology, assembly technology, coating-, bonding- and mechanical process engineering, machine tool manufacturing, textile machinery manufacturing, semiconductor machinery manufacturing; positioning facilities and positioning drives being parts of machines, all aforementioned goods mainly consisting of slide ways and slides in the nature of powered ramps as well as drive units for these slides being parts of machines consisting of electric motors with gears of hand wheels and shaft or pneumatic cylinders or hydraulic cylinders; parts of the aforementioned devices, equipment and drives, namely, electric motors, gears, machines couplings, limit pressure switches; hydraulically or pneumatically operated cylinders being parts of machines for clamping of components; lifting column in the nature of linear actuators being part of machines in the nature of height-adjustable work benches, height-adjustable medical devices, height-adjustable conveyor systems, mobile transfer systems with height adjustment, all for the adjustment of working platforms | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
- Other trademarks owned by RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
- Other trademarks owned by RK Rose + Krieger GmbH Verbindungs- und Positioniersysteme
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named RK DUOLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 7, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |