USPTO serial 79197043
KLENK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KLENK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools and parts therefor, in particular tools of steel and hard metals, where necessary with hard coatings or cutting edges, the aforesaid tools in particular for machining, the aforesaid tools in particular for metal processing, wood processing, rock processing, glass processing and plastic processing, in particular drills, namely, electric hand-held drills, hand-held pneumatic drills, power drills, air drills, rocks drills, radial drills and drills for the mining industry, centering drills, namely, centering drilling bits being parts of machines, and spot drills, namely, spotting drill bits being power drills, power tools in the nature of countersinks, milling cutters, deburring cutters, namely, deburring tools being parts of machines, namely, cutters and thread milling cutters, power tools in the nature of reamers and power saw blades, all the aforesaid goods other than hand-operated; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; tractor towed agricultural implements, namely, seed drills, forks, ploughs, harrows, spikes and cutters, not hand operated | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services of an engineer, namely, engineering services in the field of cutting machine tools for the processing of metals and synthetic materials, especially regarding strength of materials and quality control, namely, consultation in relation to the design and developing of cutting machine tools for the processing of metals and synthetic materials, especially turning, deburring and tapping tools, drills, milling cutters, side-and-face milling cutters, saws, reaming and countersinking tools; consulting in relation to the design and development of design, development of interchangeable cutting tool parts made of high speed steel, hard metal, cement, ceramics or of extra-hard materials and other cutting materials, saw teeth and extruded hard metal shank tools, guillotines for processing paper, mechanical forming tools, tool systems for cutting designed for processing metals and synthetic materials, mechanical clamping apparatus for tools and work pieces designed to be used with machine tools, automatic handling machines for storing and dispensing machine tools, wear parts for synthetic materials; technical project studies; toolmaker services, namely design, development and planning of tools and machine tools, and analysis and evaluation of products with respect to possible future applications, namely, technological consultation and product testing in the field of machine tools, in the field of industrial machinery, in the field of the metal handling systems, and in the fields of the processing of metals, of ceramics and of synthetic materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |