Drawing for COFFEE CLUB

USPTO serial 79197090

COFFEE CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5471856Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2018
Examiner
CALLOWAY, CHRISTINA DENISE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with COFFEE CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Fully automatic and semi-automatic electric coffee makers and replacement parts thereof; Coffee machines, electric, in the nature of automatic coffee dispensers and replacement parts thereof, electric coffee filters, namely, coffee filters not of paper being part of electric coffee makers, apparatus and installations for softening water; electric coffee brewers; coffee roasters; water conditioning installations and replacement parts thereof; installations for the disinfection, purification, irradiation and sterilization of water; apparatus for the purification and treatment of water; water heaters; water filtering apparatus; regulating and safety accessories for water apparatus; heating apparatus in the nature of pressure-increasing regulators for water installations; refrigerated containers for milk; steam-generating apparatus for foaming milk; hoses for supplying coffee machinesACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance, repair and adjustment of fully automatic and semi-automatic electric coffee makers and replacement parts thereof; automatic coffee dispensers, electric coffee filters, water softeners, electric coffee brewers, coffee roasters, brewers for coffee machines, apparatus for preparing milk and replacement parts thereofACTIVE—
042Research and development services in the field of fully automatic and semi-automatic electric coffee makers, automatic coffee dispensers, electric coffee filters, water softeners, electric coffee brewers and coffee roasters; research and development services in the field of fully automatic and semi-automatic electric coffee makers; design and development of electrical, electronic, pneumatic and hydraulic controls for coffee makersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 29, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 27, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 22, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 22, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 19, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 6, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 9, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance