USPTO serial 79197268
LICINIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LICINIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DE PRET ROOSE DE CALESBERG ANNE THEODORA IMPRESA INDIVIDUALE
LUCIGNANO (AR), IT
Other trademarks owned by DE PRET ROOSE DE CALESBERG ANNE THEODORA IMPRESA INDIVIDUALE
DE PRET ROOSE DE CALESBERG ANNE THEODORA IMPRESA INDIVIDUALE
LUCIGNANO (AR), IT
Other trademarks owned by DE PRET ROOSE DE CALESBERG ANNE THEODORA IMPRESA INDIVIDUALE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, alcoholic beverages except beers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DE PRET ROOSE DE CALESBERG ANNE THEODORA IMPRESA INDIVIDUALE
- Other trademarks owned by DE PRET ROOSE DE CALESBERG ANNE THEODORA IMPRESA INDIVIDUALE
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LICINIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |