Drawing for DRONE JANUS

USPTO serial 79197347

DRONE JANUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5461163Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2018
Examiner
COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRONE JANUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret O'Donnell

Mary Margaret O'Donnell Blue Filament Law PLLC700 E. Maple RoadSuite 450Birmingham, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Apparatus for locomotion by air, land or water, namely, planes, automobiles, boats; remote-controlled land vehicles, namely, electric automobiles and battery-powered electric vehicles; unmanned aircraft, namely, drones and remote-controlled aircraft in the nature of unmanned aerial vehicles; transmission for land vehicles; motors and engines for land vehicles; suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; bodies for vehicles; anti-skid chains for vehicles; vehicle chassis; vehicle bumpers; sun-blinds adapted for automobiles; safety belts for vehicle seats; caravans in the nature of vans; tractors; mopeds; motorcycles; frames, kickstands, brakes, handlebars, wheel rims, pedals, tires, wheels and saddles for motorcycles and bicycles; strollers; handling cartsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 9, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 22, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 22, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 8, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 8, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 14, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance