USPTO serial 79197584
MAXXELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXXELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic hair care preparations; hair treatment preparations; hair creams; cosmetics; hair lotions; hair shampoo; hair nourishers; preparations for setting hair; tints for the hair; hair emollients; hair bleaching preparations; hair mousses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |