Drawing for JINQIAOER

USPTO serial 79197589

JINQIAOER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JINQIAOER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Imitation leather; travelling trunks; rucksacks; pocket wallets; briefcases; valises; trunks in the nature of luggage; bags for sports; umbrellas; canesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 5, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 5, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 5, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Oct 19, 2017OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 24, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 13, 2017LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 6, 2017LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 6, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance