Drawing for EFH GLOBAL ECO FOOD HUB

USPTO serial 79197664

EFH GLOBAL ECO FOOD HUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EFH GLOBAL ECO FOOD HUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others; business management and organization consultancy; import-export agencies; marketing; personnel management consultancy; procurement services for others purchasing goods and services for other businesses; systemization of information into computer databases; rental of vending machinesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 8, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 8, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 8, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 4, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 25, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Aug 30, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 22, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance