Drawing for CONSTELLATION

USPTO serial 79197696

CONSTELLATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSTELLATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

MICHAEL J LEONARD FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVEBLDG 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018luggage; trunks; travelling cases of leather; suitcases; valises; travelling bags; sports bags; briefcases; executive cases, namely briefcases; handbags; rucksacks; backpacks; overnight bags, school bags; wallets; purses; reusable shopping bags; beach bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 5, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 25, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 3, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 3, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 3, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 22, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance