Drawing for 1.2 THINK THIN

USPTO serial 79197722

1.2 THINK THIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5283206Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 12, 2017
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1.2 THINK THIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary C. Bonnema

Mary C. Bonnema Warner Norcross + Judd LLP150 Ottawa Ave NWSuite 1500Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Marble; marble for construction; tiles of marble; stone; building stone; stone for paving; building materials in natural stone, namely, slabs, roofing tiles, veneers and wall tilesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 4, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 30, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 29, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 2, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 12, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance