USPTO serial 79197819
HK L-137
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHERY, JEFFREY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HK L-137?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Lactic acid bacteria for use in food manufacture, other than for medical purposes; lactobacillus strain bacteria for use in food manufacture, other than for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for treating fatigue; lactic acid bacteria, for medical purposes,namely,the treatment of fatigue; animal feed additives, namely, proteins, fats, carbohydrates, amino acids, vitamins and minerals for use as a nutritional supplement for medical purposes; dietary supplements mainly containing lactic acid bacteria in the form of tablet, capsule, chewable, granule, granular, powder, solid, semisolid, liquid or paste; dietary supplements mainly containing vitamin, mineral, calcium or dietary fiber in the form of tablet, capsule, chewable, granule, granular, powder, solid, semisolid, liquid or paste; protein supplements for animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Animal foodstuffs containing lactic acid bacteria; animal foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |