Drawing for WARLORDS

USPTO serial 79197908

WARLORDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUCHA, JOHN EVAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WARLORDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecilia R. Dickson

MAIKOWSKI & NINNEMANNKurfürstendamm 54-5510707 Berlin,GERMANY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; recorded and downloadable computer programs and software for video games, online games and browser games and for computer game programs for mobile phones and other mobile devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Electronic games (other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor), in particular computer, video, online and browser games, included in this class; LCD game machines; parlour games; portable devices for playing electronic games (other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor), balloons (toys); soft toys; stuffed toy animals; balls for games; playthings; toy vehicles; scale model vehicles; remote-controlled vehicles (toys)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038Providing access to information and electronic transfer of information in the form of text, images, speech and sounds via websites; arranging and rental of access rights to websites, namely, arranging and providing access to websites; providing access to software on data networks for internet access; broadcasting of film, television, radio, VTX, videotext, teletext programmes or transmissions, in particular commercials; providing access to databases; providing access to information from a database or from the internetSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Conducting of games on the internet; entertainment, in particular in the form of online computer games, video games and browser games, online game programs for mobile phones and other mobile devices, and in the form of information for mobile phones and other mobile devices, and in the form of information about entertainment on the internet; game services provided online (via a computer network)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 3, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 4, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 21, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance