USPTO serial 79197945
GLASSOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2017
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GLASSOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
NL
Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
NL
Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
NL
Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 Madison St., Suite AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education, namely, conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the field of glassware; training services in the field of glassware; entertainment services, namely, glass-making contests; cultural activities, namely, glass-making contests; organizing of contests and competitions in the field of glassware; organization of shows for cultural purposes; organizing events for cultural purposes for online communities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
- Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
- Other trademarks owned by B.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Glasfabriek "Leerdam"
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GLASSOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 26, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 7, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |