Drawing for TRANSCRIPT EXPRESS

USPTO serial 79198204

TRANSCRIPT EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TRANSCRIPT EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacey R. Halpern

Stacey R. Halpern Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software, namely, computer software that enables the streaming and near-live playback of digital audio and video recordings on desktop computers and mobile devices and includes the ability to digitally flag recorded material during streaming or playback for later reference; apparatus for use in digital communication transmission, namely, digital transmitters; computer apparatus for processing and transmitting data, namely, computer hardware; data processing software, including for word processing; data transmitters; apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and images; data entry apparatus, namely, electronic data loggers; data recording apparatus, electronic data recorders; apparatus for the recording of sound and data; transcription apparatus, namely, data processors; audio processing apparatus, namely, limiters and compressors; audio recording apparatus, namely, digital audio tape recorders; audio recordings and video recordings featuring message transcriptionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Legal transcription services; legal data transcription services; typing; transcription services, namely, legal data entry for others; word processing; business services being document preparation, namely, preparing transcripts of audio of court proceedingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
045Legal support services, namely, conducting electronic legal discovery in the nature of reviewing e-mails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit; legal document preparation servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2019IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Mar 25, 2019IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 11, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 1, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 29, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance