Drawing for MAKUTE

USPTO serial 79198218

MAKUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5388779Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 30, 2018
Examiner
ROSENTHAL, AARON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MAKUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yue (Robert) Xu

Yue (Robert) Xu Apex Attorneys at Law, LLP160 Alamo Plaza #942Alamo, CA 94507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Saw machines; welding machines, electric; generators of electricity; electric hammers; cutting machines; angle burnishing machines in the nature of power-operated floor burnishers and for polishing metal and floors; hand-held tools, other than hand-operated, namely, electric drills, electric hammers; engraving machines; hand-held electric drills; Machine cutting tools, namely, cutting torches, die-cutting machines, fiber cutting machines, cutting machines for metalworking, high speed steel drillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 24, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 24, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2023CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 29, 2023CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 2, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 30, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance