USPTO serial 79198295
VIPSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, SHA-KARA ELOUISE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIPSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software applications, for mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers, namely, software for use in database management, use in electronic storage of data; blank and encoded smart cards, namely, integrated circuit cards; downloadable image files containing films, photographs and pictures; laptop computers; computer operating programs, recorded; computer programs, recorded for document management, using the internet and the world wide web; data processing apparatus; computer programs, downloadable featuring game piece figures; computer software, recorded, for downloading and organizing music files, authenticating user identification; downloadable electronic publications, in the nature of newsletters, journals and books in the fields of entertainment, games, cartoons, news and fashion | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Radio broadcasting; message sending services; telephone services; communications by telephone; electronic mail, namely, transmission of electronic mail; information about telecommunication; telecommunications services, namely, electronic bulletin board services; providing telecommunication channels for teleshopping services; providing access to databases; voice mail services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Guangzhou Vipshop Information TechnologyCo., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Guangzhou Vipshop Information TechnologyCo., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by VIPSHOP (China) Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named VIPSHOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |