Drawing for SEA-LOC

USPTO serial 79198338

SEA-LOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEA-LOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Ballast systems for floating metal docks and other systems for conveying or pumping fluid within the shipyard and marine technological sector (locks at the marine extremity of a ship canal not included) (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Semisubmersible drilling rigs and other equipment related to the shipyard- and marine technological sector, namely, ballast systems and other systems for conveying or pumping fluid (locks at the marine extremity of a ship canal not included) (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Computer software and and other equipment related to the shipyard- and marine technological sector, namely, for regulating, controlling or monitoring ballast systems or other systems for conveying or pumping fluid (locks at the marine extremity of a ship canal not included)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Ships, ships hulls and other equipment and vessels related to the shipyard- and marine technological sector, namely, ballast systems and other systems for conveying and pumping fluids for ships and vessels (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Construction project management and consultancy services (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); on-site construction supervision; installation-, maintenance- and repair services of equipment related to the shipyard- and marine technological sector, all the aforementioned services for ballast systems and other systems for conveying or pumping fluid but not for locks at the marine extremity of a ship canalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039Offshore transportation services; transportation services within the shipyard- and marine technological sectorSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Engineering services; engineering; technical and design feasibility studies; industrial design; design consultation; technical design; technical consultancy services related to marine and offshore engineering; technological advisory services; conducting engineering surveys; computer software development, all the aforementioned services for ballast systems and other systems for conveying and pumping fluid bit not for locks at the marine extremity of a ship canalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 21, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 20, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 27, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 24, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance