USPTO serial 79198551
AERSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5319428Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2017
- Examiner
- FERRELL, STEVEN WAYNE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AERSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
Deborah J. Peckham BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 High StreetBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Apparatus and devices for machine control namely, hydraulic and pneumatic controls for machines; hydraulic and pneumatic control mechanisms for machines, motors and engines; all of the foregoing in the wastewater treatment field * with regard to the energetic optimization of industrial and water provision facilities * | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Software for controlling machines, motors, and engines; computer hardware; electronic control systems for machines; computer software and hardware systems for electric and electronic controls and control devices for controlling machines, motors, and engines; master electric or electronic control systems, namely, electronic controllers; electric and electronic controls for the interconnected operation of blower and compressor units; all of the foregoing in the wastewater treatment field * with regard to the energetic optimization of industrial and water provision facilities * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AERZENER MASCHINENFABRIK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by AERZENER MASCHINENFABRIK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by AERZENER MASCHINENFABRIK GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AERSMART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |