USPTO serial 79198602
HUB'ON BNP PARIBAS LEASING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUB'ON BNP PARIBAS LEASING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for data processing and computers; software (recorded programs); computer programs; application software; application software for mobile telephones; application software for wireless devices; downloadable computer software applications; interfaces (for computers); data processing equipment; downloadable electronic publications; application software and software downloaded via the Internet and in connection with concierge services online | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; commercial business management; commercial administration; price comparison services; provision of on-line sales areas for sellers and buyers of goods and services; commercial information via websites; sponsorship search; news clipping services; auctioneering services; compilation of information into computer databases; business organization consultancy; professional business consultancy; computerized file management; commercial intermediary services caretaking; office machine and equipment rental; updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; data search in computer files for others; opinion polling; compilation of statistics; systematization of information in computer databases; outsourcing services business assistance; provision of a telephone information service (directories) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |