Drawing for AVIVA

USPTO serial 79198939

AVIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean P. McMahon

SEAN P MCMAHON OSTROLENK FABER LLP845 THIRD AVENUE8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines and sparkling winesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 5, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 24, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 26, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 26, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 13, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 11, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 11, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 8, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 28, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 19, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 22, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance