Drawing for SISTEMATICA

USPTO serial 79198988

SISTEMATICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5332041Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2017
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SISTEMATICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn S Lederman

Robyn S Lederman Brooks Kushman PC1000 Town CenterSouthfield, MI 48075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote control for tractors, joggers, reapers, harvesters, ploughs, seed drills; remote controls for electric and hydraulic windlasses, catwalks and tender lifts; remote controls for concrete pumps; remote controls for cranes; remote controls for fire trucks; remote controls for winches; remote controls for hook lifts; remote controls for steering wheels, working lights, ramps; remote controls for trailers; remote controls for snow plough; remote controls for stallholder covers; remote controls for sweepers; remote controls for lifts; remote controls for tippers; remote controls for car carriers; remote controls for livestock trucks; remote controls for water pressure cleaners, blasters; remote controls for wheelchair accessible vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 31, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 13, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 31, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 2, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 14, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 13, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 14, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 7, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance