USPTO serial 79199059
SOUNDHAPTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUNDHAPTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP5845 RICHMOND HIGHWAY, SUITE 415ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile telephones; loudspeakers; headphones; headsets, namely, virtual reality headsets and headsets for use with computers; electric actuators; electroacoustic transducers; controllers for computer games; electronic controllers for use in interfacing with computer generated virtual reality environments; ; goggles for virtual reality; touch pad; displays for computers; computer mouse; keyboards; portable terminal devices, namely, portable computer terminals; portable digital audio players; handles for remote control in the field of simulation, flight and driving; operating handles for simulators in the field of flight and driving; helmets for virtual reality, namely, helmets containing electronic circuitry for use in viewing and interacting in virtual reality environments; wearable computer peripherals, namely, wearable information terminal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |