USPTO serial 79199142
BICT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2018
- Examiner
- ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BICT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
JP
Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
JP
Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
JP
Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
Gary D. Krugman Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Ave NWWashington, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for data analysis and computation and operating software in the fields of artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks and adaptive systems; computer software for data analysis and computation and operating software in the field of artificial intelligence applications; computer software for use in designing and developing artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks; computer software, namely, software for implementing a computer programming language, and computer software development tools, for use in the fields of artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks; computer software, hardware and embedded systems consisting of computer software and hardware for data analysis and computation and operating software in the fields of artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks; application programming interface (API) software allowing users to develop software applications; computer hardware and software for data analysis and computation and operating software in the field of artificial intelligence based on brain science and information science | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business advisory and consultancy in the fields of artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks; business information services in the fields of artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks; business development services in the fields of artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks; business data analysis, assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business analysis in the nature of business management analysis, in the fields of artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks; organizing and conducting trade shows in the fields of computers, computer services and information technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development relating to technology in the field of artificial intelligence; research and development relating to technology in the field of artificial intelligence based on brain science and information science; consultancy relating to technology in the field of artificial intelligence; computer programming; design of computer software; updating and maintenance of computer software; computer system design for others; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; research and consultancy services relating to the design and development of computer hardware; computer systems analysis; integration of computer systems; consultancy relating to computer network system design; consultancy services relating to computer software design; consultancy services relating to the maintenance of computer software; consultancy services relating to the rental of computer software; computer aided artificial intelligence technology technical data analysis; providing online non-downloadable computer software for creating, developing and operating artificial intelligence technology; providing online non-downloadable computer software for use as an application programming interface (API) for use in the fields of artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning and deep neural networks; design, development, and implementation of software for data analytics; consulting services relating to software used in the field of data analytics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (NEC Corporation)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BICT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |