Drawing for JAYLEC

USPTO serial 79199239

JAYLEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5440351Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2018
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAYLEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009WARNING LIGHTS IN THE NATURE OF LUMINESCENT BEACONS; WARNING LIGHTS IN THE NATURE OF FLASHING LUMINESCENT BEACONS; STROBE LIGHTS IN THE NATURE OF LUMINESCENT BEACONS FOR WARNING PURPOSESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011LIGHTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, LIGHT GLOBES; VEHICLE LIGHTING, NAMELY, HEADLIGHTS, REAR LIGHTS, INTERIOR LIGHTS, SIGNALLING LIGHTS; WARNING LAMPS OTHER THAN BEACONS, NAMELY, FLASHING STROBE LIGHT APPARATUSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012MOTORS, ENGINES AND COMPONENTS FOR VEHICLES, NAMELY, DRIVING MOTORS AND ENGINES FOR LAND VEHICLES AND PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR; BRAKE CABLES FOR VEHICLESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 27, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 25, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 24, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 23, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 19, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance