Drawing for Serial No. 79199290

USPTO serial 79199290

Serial No. 79199290

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79199290?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045On-line social networking servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 7, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 31, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 30, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2017UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Feb 3, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 17, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance