USPTO serial 79199550
ZAZEN WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5624572Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2018
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZAZEN WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Schloff
Jay Schloff AIDENBAUM SCHLOFF & BLOOM PLLC6960 Orchard Lake RoadSuite 250West Bloomfield, MI, 48322Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aerated water; bottled water; drinking water; mineral water; natural drinking water; spring water, other than for medical purposes; water beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vanessa Drummond
- Other trademarks owned by Janet Parker
- Other trademarks owned by Janet Parker
- Other trademarks owned by Vanessa Drummond
- Other trademarks owned by Janet Parker
- Other trademarks owned by Vanessa Drummond
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ZAZEN WATER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |