USPTO serial 79199611
Serial No. 79199611
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 79199611?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic lotions for reducing the appearance of age spots and freckles; gels and oils for tanning (cosmetics); gel eye masks; anti-aging cosmetic preparations; pore tightening pack (cosmetics); moisturising skin lotions (cosmetic); whitening essence; beauty creams; beauty packs; serums (cosmetics); cosmetic preparations for skin care; skin cleansers; skin toners; eye cream; facial essences; nourishing cream (cosmetics); toilet water; wrinkle removing skin care preparations; facial oils; cosmetic creams and lotions for face and body care; eye make-up; eye make-up (cosmetics); lip gloss; lip liner; lip balm; lipsticks; mascara; make-up; blusher; blush; blush pencils; blush-on colour cosmetic powders; eye liner; eye shadow; concealers (cosmetics); make-up for compacts; creamy rouges; creamy foundation; creamy face powder; cosmetic rouges; exfoliant cosmetics; cosmetics for massage; cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; cosmetic preparations for body care; sun care preparations; non-medicated scrubs for face and body; cosmetics for hair and scalp; hair oils; skin milk for men; skin fresheners for men; skin whitening preparations; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; hand cream; make-up removing preparations; shaving gel; perfumes in solid form; liquid perfumes; perfumes and colognes; scented oils used to produce aromas when heated; diffuser aromatics; room fragrances; aromatic oils; natural perfumery; oils for perfumes and scents; tissues impregnated with make-up removing preparations; cleaning pads impregnated with cosmetics; exfoliant soaps; bubble bath preparations; cleansing foam in the form of bubble; multi functional shampoo; shampoo for the care of scalp; liquid soap; beauty soap; body soaps; body wash; cosmetics; functional cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |