USPTO serial 79199786
LIQUATS VEGETALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIQUATS VEGETALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, live fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk, cream, butter, cheese; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; persevered olives; edible oils and fats; preserves and food products based on soybeans, in this class, namely soy yogurt, and tofu | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa powder; Liquid cocoa, namely beverages with a chocolate base and chocolate sauce; Pastry cream, namely cocoa cream; sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; Preparations made from cereals, namely, flour, starch for food, bread, pastry and confectionery; edible ices; chocolates, candy, sweetmeats, licorice bars; candy, namely sugared almonds; beverages based on cocoa, coffee and chocolate; honey and royal jelly for food purposes; molasses; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; condiments; spices; ice; food products derived from soybeans in this class, namely soybean molasses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic beverages, namely non-alcoholic honey-based beverages and non-alcoholic rice-based beverages not being milk substitutes; fruit beverages and juices; horchata; almond milk; syrups and other preparations for making refreshing non-alcoholic beverages derived from soybeans, namely soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |