Drawing for SYNGINEER BY EPLAN & CIDEON

USPTO serial 79199835

SYNGINEER BY EPLAN & CIDEON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5505305Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2018
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNGINEER BY EPLAN & CIDEON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Smith

MATTHEW J SMITH POLSINELLI PC100 SOUTH FOURTH ST STE 1000ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in computer-aided engineering and design automation and for use in machine and plant design in the fields of automation technology and for computer-aided construction projects; data processing hardware; digital media, namely, prerecorded compact discs and DVD's and downloadable audio files featuring computer-aided engineering and design automationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Conducting of training events for software usersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; scientific and technological services, namely, computer-aided construction, modification of programs for user-specific application and construction and automated manufacturing (CAD/CAM); research and design in the field of computer-aided construction, modification of programs for user-specific application and design for use in construction and automated manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in the field of engineering and design automation, construction projects in the nature of projects in the nature of construction drafting and design automation as well as modification of computer programs for special user requirements, and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services in the field of design and development of computer hardware and software; engineering services; consultancy in the field of computer hardware and software; consultancy about computer systems; consultation services relating to computer hardware; advisory services relating to computer hardware design; engineering consultancy services; engineering project studies; conducting engineering surveys; preparation of engineering reportsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 25, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 17, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 17, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 30, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 3, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 22, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 15, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 20, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 20, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 20, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 20, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 20, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance