Drawing for YAEGAKI CLOUD

USPTO serial 79199885

YAEGAKI CLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5298810Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 3, 2017
Examiner
TRATOS, MARK STEVEN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with YAEGAKI CLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Simor L. Moskowitz

Simor L. Moskowitz Westerman, Hattori, LLP8500 Leesburg Pike, Ste. 7500Tysons, VA 22182United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033[ Alcoholic aperitif bitters; alcoholic beverages except beers; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; alcoholic beverages, namely, digestifs; alcoholic cocktail mixes; alcoholic cocktails containing milk; alcoholic cocktails in the form of chilled gelatins; alcoholic cocktails in the form of frozen pops; alcoholic cocktails in the form of non-chilled gelatins; alcoholic coffee-based beverage; alcoholic fruit beverages; alcoholic fruit cocktail drinks; alcoholic fruit extracts; alcoholic mixed beverages except beers; alcoholic punches; alcoholic tea-based beverage; alcopops; anise liqueur; aperitifs; coffee-based liqueurs; Japanese regenerated liquors (naoshi); Japanese sweet rice-based mixed liquor (shiro-zake); Korean traditional rice wine (makgeoli); liqueurs; ] rice alcohol; sakeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 2, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 9, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 9, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 22, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 3, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 14, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 14, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance