CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for POWERMASTER

USPTO serial 79199945

POWERMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5343318Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2017
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with POWERMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Holly M. Ford Lewis

Holly M. Ford Lewis Oliff PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metalworking machine tools, in particular numerically controlled metalworking machine tools; spindles for machine tools being parts of metalworking machine toolsACTIVE—
037Maintenance and repair of spindles for metalworking machine tools; spindle rebuilding in connection with spindles for metalworking machines; spindle reconditioning in connection with spindles for metalworking machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 15, 2025CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 30, 2025CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 21, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 31, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 30, 2024EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2024PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jul 15, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 1, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 19, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 14, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance