Drawing for ANAQUA HYPERVIEW

USPTO serial 79200029

ANAQUA HYPERVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6138334Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 1, 2020
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ANAQUA HYPERVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,275

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik N. Lund

Erik N. Lund Whitestone Law PLLC8000 Westpark Drive. Suite 250Mclean, VA 22102United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for data analysis and representation; software for database management and compilation of data in computer databases; software for statistical analysis, reporting, dashboard generating, detection of events; all of the foregoing excluding software for analyzing time segmented flow cytometry dataACTIVE—
035Study and analysis of company data, namely, providing economic intelligence and data analysis, market study and analysis, marketing studies, commercial data analysis, economic forecasting and analysis, company auditing, analysis and reporting, statistics; all of the foregoing excluding analyzing time segmented flow cytometry dataACTIVE—
042Design of tools for data analysis and representation; software design; design of data processing systems; all of the foregoing excluding software and design of software for analyzing time segmented flow cytometry dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 24, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 21, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 4, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 1, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 26, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 4, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 29, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 31, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 28, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 24, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance