USPTO serial 79200199
BOOKSY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB,SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOOKSY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of hardware and software; providing and developing search engines for the Internet; creation and maintenance of web sites for third persons; server hosting of Internet sites; technological consultancy in the technology field of software; outsource service providers in the field of information technology field, namely, cloud computing and software as a service SaaS; industrial design; electronic conversion of data or programs; computer software design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |