Drawing for SOFT CARE

USPTO serial 79200271

SOFT CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOFT CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bassam N. Ibrahim

BASSAM N IBRAHIM BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC1737 KING STREETSUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body washing lotion; shampoos; bath foam; body cream; non-medicated skin cream for the treatment of irritation; pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; non-medicated soap-free soap; body oil; bath oil; and other toiletries, namely, non-medicated toiletry preparations; all of the aforementioned goods to be used for babies and young childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 27, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 27, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 9, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 19, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 19, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 19, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 19, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2017CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 24, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 21, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 21, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance