Drawing for EQ BOOST

USPTO serial 79200399

EQ BOOST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REID, CAILE MAUREEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQ BOOST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane Donnelly

Diane Donnelly von Maltitz Derenberg Kunin Janssen etc60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2446,New York, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land motor vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 26, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 27, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance